When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On January 30, 2017, the Defendant injured the victim B, the victim called “SPYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTNYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

As a result, the defendant got a scarcity of a scarcity that requires treatment for about 14 days to the victim.

2. On the same day as paragraph (1) 1, the Defendant: (a) 20:35 on the same day; (b) 20:35 on the same day; (c) the Victim E (64) returned to the said restaurant; (d) the Defendant reported the Victim E (64) and did not good to the width of the ordinary victim.

I think, "the victim should not do so.................................

As a result, the defendant suffered multiple scambling in need of treatment for about 22 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Statement made by the police for B and E;

1. Investigation report by each prosecutor (to hear statements by victim B telephone, hear statements by victim E phone, hear statements by witness G phone, and hear statements by witness);

1. Each police investigation report (as at the time of dispatch, etc., attachment of a victim Eth injury diagnosis report);

1. A report on internal investigation by the police (limited to attachment of a written diagnosis of injury inflicted on the victim B);

1. Application of two Acts and subordinate statutes to two photographs; and

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;