If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On July 30, 2017, the Defendant, even though there was no intention or ability to pay the drinking value, had shown the attitude that the Defendant ordered the victim D (V, 47 years of age) who is the business owner to pay the drinking value while ordering the drinking to the victim D (V, 47 years of age) who is the business owner at the place, and had been provided with the beer 5 Byung and Ma-ju 2 L, who is believed to be true, and acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 78,000 in total from the victims who believe it to be true. The Defendant received one entertainment receptionist and received one entertainment receptionist, and acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 78,000 in total with the female.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements and field photographs of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police investigation reports (related to the difference in the amount of damage);

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;