[criminal power] On February 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Suwon District Court on February 9, 2012; on August 10, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court on February 18, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive, and the said suspended sentence was invalidated. On August 29, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Suwon District Court on February 24

【Criminal Facts】

At around 08:00 on April 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft of money and valuables worth KRW 9,940,000 in total over 11 times from April 1, 2015 to April 11, 2015, which was 59, 000, 000, as indicated in the annexed crime list; (b) committed a attempted theft of money and valuables worth KRW 9,940,000,000 in total, which was 11 times in front of an elevator located in the exit of 59,00,000.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals the victims' property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, G, H, I, and J;

1. Each statement of K, L and C;

1. Investigation report (in cases of the Gu to which a suspect uses for committing a crime, investigation into such Gu);

1. Protocols of seizure, list of seizure, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Each site and photograph of damaged articles;

1. Ect images by cutting ct v images;

1. A photograph of damaged articles (GOba);

1. Photographs photographs of damaged articles;

1. Previous records before and after judgments: replies to results of the search by prisoners, criminal records, replys to inquiry (A), investigation reports (where the suspect is the same as the suspect, report on attachment of the judgment), and six copies of the judgment;

1. Habituality of the judgment: The records of each crime in the judgment, the defendant was confined to the same kind of crime, and the period of release has not yet passed since the defendant was released from the crime in the judgment, recognition of dampness in light of the methods and frequency of the crime in the case, etc.

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;