폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The lower court rendered a sentence as above in consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed several repeated crimes, such as kidnapping and taking a minor of a middle and high school student at the time of organized violence; (b) purchasing and selling precious metals with the credit card; and (c) cutting away the victim's goods at class 1 with a speech or hearing impairment and hearing impairment; and (d) repeating the crime in light of the frequency and method of the crime; (b) the Defendant committed a repeated crime during the period of repeated crime, such as the record in the judgment; (c) the Defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case; (d) reflects the mistake; (d) the gains acquired from the crime; (e) the victims were not much high, N, H, AF, S (T; (T); (e) the victims of the victims of the crime; (e) the victims of maternal disease with the maternity and hearing disorder; and (e) the victims of pharmacologic treatment, mental therapy treatment, etc. to reduce the impulse and attack.
In full view of all the sentencing conditions, other than the circumstances considered by the lower court, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, health, background leading to the commission of the crime, degree of participation in the crime, means and consequence, scale of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court appears to be reasonable, and the lower court’s sentencing judgment exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion.
There is no circumstance that the assessment or maintenance thereof is deemed unfair (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Therefore, it is difficult to deem that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unfair because it is too unreasonable as the Defendant alleged.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.