In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Defendant

A is a vice officer of the D D D Teaching Association, and Defendant B is a person who was working as a caregiver at the E Medical Care Center.

1. On April 15, 2013, at around 17:00, the Defendants were to find the above medical care center operated by the victim to receive KRW 115,00,00, a part of the benefits that Defendant B worked at the victim’s medical care center and did not receive.

A victim who became aware of the fact that the Defendants discovered was found is hiding the Defendants on the face of the State in order not to deceive the Defendants.

Defendant B was aware of the Defendants, and Defendant B got sound from the ward of the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the victim’s use of a serious dementia patient who was protected in the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the hospital for the victim’s care for about

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victim's medical care center work.

2. At the same time and place as the preceding paragraph of the assault, Defendant B requested the victim to talk, but the victim refused and avoided it, Defendant A assaulted with the victim’s arms, and in compliance with this, Defendant A assaulted the victim, such as “I ambling, entering, leaving, and forced by force, the victim’s arms, and tearing.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to G and H

1. Defendants of the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment: Articles 314(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act.