However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 10, 2017, around 18:16, the Defendant driven a car with C-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-dong,

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating and safely operating the steering and brakes well, and driving the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim D (74 years old, south) who was crossing the passage to the right side from the left side of the defendant's driving direction due to negligence in the course of his duty and did not discover the victim D (74 years old, south) and had the victim go beyond the part of the victim's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver's driver'

The defendant caused the victim to suffer from the blood cerebral brain injury due to the above occupational negligence, and around February 19, 2017, the F Hospital located in Busan Northern-gu E caused the death of the victim from the acute pulmonary function.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual condition and photographs of the scene of an accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a death certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of recommended punishment: Not to punish the mitigated area (from April to one year) (special mitigated person) of the Class two types of traffic accidents (Death or Injury caused by traffic accidents).

2. The sentencing factors are determined by taking into account various factors of sentencing, such as the following: (a) the Defendant’s negligence in the Defendant’s decision-making decision-making and the occurrence of a serious result of the death of the victim; (b) the person subject to the said special mitigation and reflectness; (c) the subscription to a comprehensive insurance; (d) the absence of reasons falling under the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Act on