수산업법위반
The judgment below
Among them, violation of public law and violation of Fisheries Act due to the praise and encouragement of Defendant B, D, and H.
1. Case progress
A. Defendant A1) On May 15, 1968 and August 26, 1968, the Defendant was prosecuted for a violation of the public law against the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan branch, and applied for amendments to the amendment of the Fisheries Act on September 19, 1968 during trial on the 3rd day of September 19, 1968. (2) On November 7, 1968, the Jeonju District Court found the Defendant guilty of violating the public law due to escape among the facts charged, and sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of 2 years and suspension of qualification for 10 months. The Defendant was acquitted of the violation of the public law due to the diversing, maring, and rubber among the facts charged, and the violation of the Fisheries Act.
[The judgment of the court below (hereinafter "the judgment of the court below") was appealed by the prosecutor on November 7, 1968, 68.68Da538, 805, 1058, 1058, and 1658 (each combination), hereinafter "the judgment of the court below"). The Gwangju High Court appealed on March 13, 1969 (1) the prosecutor's appeal on the violation of anti-public law due to diving out of the acquittal portion of the judgment of the court below, and the violation of anti-public law due to obscenity and rubber, is without merit; (2) the prosecutor's appeal on the violation of the Fisheries Act is without merit; and (3) the court below found the defendant not guilty on the violation of public law due to escape recognized by the court below; and (4) the judgment of the court below is reversed and sentenced to suspension of execution three years for the defendant; and (3) all the violation of each anti-public law are acquitted (the judgment of the court of Gwangju High Court of appeal 68293, 303, hereinafter "the judgment of retrial").
4) The Prosecutor’s appeal was dismissed on June 24, 1969. The Prosecutor’s appeal was dismissed.
(Supreme Court Decision 69Do588 Decided June 24, 1969; hereinafter “Supreme Court Decision”). Ultimately, the Defendant was convicted of violating the Fisheries Act among the facts charged against the Defendant.
B. On August 26, 1968, Defendant B 1 added the fact of violation of the Fisheries Act on September 19, 1968, which was pending trial due to the violation of the public law against the Jeonju District Court’s Gunsan branch.