Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On July 2, 2019, around July 17, 2019, the Defendant stated that “F will take meals with G and walked with four customers,” among D and E, within the C B of G D and other tables.

However, there was no fact that the victim F was flick with G or flicking with G.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses G and E respective legal statements;

1. Each police statement of F, G, D, and E [the defendant and his defense counsel stated that “F, F, G, and G provide meals to E, and are not in math,” but the defendant knew of the above statement from another person and believed it to be true, so there was no intention of defamation caused by false facts, and only G, E do so. The defendant asserts to the effect that there was no performance. This court duly adopted and examined the following circumstances, namely, ① the defendant made the statement to E that “F makes a meal with G, and walk off,” and, at the time, it was acknowledged that there was no intention or public performance of defamation between the victim and his defense counsel, the defendant did not appear to have been aware of the following facts: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 17517, Mar. 1, 1999; Presidential Decree No. 20104, Apr. 2, 2006>