However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 8, 2016, the Defendant 22:25 around 22:25, 2016, when he was on the 16th of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the 1stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the 16th of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of the stalth of

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the crime of this case is committed against a police officer who performs official duties, and is not good, but has no criminal record of suspended execution or more, and the defendant is against the law;

for the purpose of this chapter.

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;