beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.05.04 2016고단115

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 115"

1. On August 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on August 13, 2015, up to 19:05, acquired a new credit card No. 1 of D (C’s put), which was lost by C, from the subway platform of the 1147 Mos Seo-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu; (b) 1 of the new physical card owned by the victim; (c) 1 of the Korean physical card No. 1; and (d) 1 of the Korean bank security card No. 1 of the Korean bank security card.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzleds articles that have been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. Violation of Acts in financial business specializing in fraud and credit finance;

A. On the same day, the Defendant purchased “G convenience store” operated by the Victim F in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, in the “G convenience store” on the same day, and acquired the lost credit card by presenting a new credit card copy in the name of D acquired, such as the above paragraph (1), to the said G convenience store employees, and by deceiving the victim to pay KRW 45,000, the Defendant acquired the same amount of pecuniary benefits.

B. At around 19:37 on the same day, the Defendant purchased the “J convenience store” operated by the victim I in Sung-nam-si, Sungnam-si, and acquired the lost credit card by presenting a new credit card copy in the name of D acquired, such as the above paragraph (1), from the employees of the above J convenience store, and by deceiving the victim to pay KRW 45,000, the Defendant acquired the same amount of pecuniary benefits.

"2016 Highest 655"

1. On September 25, 2015, the Defendant, at around 05:40 on September 25, 2015, acquired one copy of the Agricultural Credit Card (Credit Card Number M) owned by the victim L, who was lost in front of the Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

This is the defendant.