2. The appellate court’s judgment is reasonable to respect the first-class sentencing judgment in a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first-class judgment, and the first-class sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

The defendant asserts that the defendant's act of violation of the Food Sanitation Act was committed on the ground of appeal, including the following: (a) the defendant's birth, who had attempted to sleep the defendant's work on the day of the case, was not a regular employee; and (b) the defendant's birth, which led to the crime of this case, was not an active employee; (c) there are circumstances to consider the situation; (d) there are economic difficulties, such as operating the main points of this case; (e) the defendant is operating the main points of this case; and (e) supporting the old parents and two minor children; and (e) the defendant was subject to the disposition of suspension of business due to the crime

However, according to the evidence submitted in this case, it does not seem that the photographer had led the person to gather the crime of this case, or the defendant's birth did not help the person to do so only on the day of the case (for example, it is difficult to believe that the evidence submitted in the trial contrary thereto is insufficient) and unlike others, the sentencing conditions have been significantly changed in the trial of the party.

There is no circumstance to consider.

In full view of the fact that the criminal records and fines of the defendant are two times, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.