However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2017. 10. 7. 23:10 경 안산시 상록 구 C 앞 노상에서 자신과 다퉜던

D Using bricks and knife knife knife (33 cm in total length, 17 cm in knife) which is a dangerous object that is dissatisfied with D, flife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written estimate;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 319 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act appears to be the attitude of the defendant against the defendant. The fact that the defendant agreed with the victim is advantageous to the victim, the crime of this case is bad in light of the risk, and the fact that the defendant has a lot of records of the same punishment are disadvantageous to the defendant, and the punishment like the order is determined by taking into account all the conditions of sentencing recorded in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case.