However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of B B B B luri vehicles in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act (not after the accident);

On January 26, 2018, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.078% from blood alcohol level around 21:48, while driving the said vehicle, and driven the two-lane road of Drackp Dopple in the following City C in the following City: The Defendant driven the said vehicle according to two-lanes from the EL chemical ozone distance room to the second long distance distance.

At the time, since it was at night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by reducing speed and by checking well the right and the right of the front.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant did not neglect his duty to see the front side of the instant truck, the Defendant left the left side of F 25 tons F25 tons of the victim E, which is parked on the side of the two-lane side of the masted off, and continued to turn hand over to the left side of the Defendant vehicle, and continued to turn hand over to the left side of the vehicle, and then, the Defendant saw hand on the right side, plpl up the hand to the right side, set up the two-lane, and made the victim G(52) who was located on the above 10 meters off the above truck to go beyond the delivery of the vehicle.

The Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, destroyed the truck owned by the victim E to use the truck equivalent to KRW 346,100 for the repair cost of the vehicle, and immediately stopped without taking necessary measures, and escaped without taking necessary measures. The Defendant sustained injury to the victim G, such as the mouth, closure, and right side of the inside and outside of the ceiling, which require approximately four weeks medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1, driven the foregoing Tball vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.078%, as stated in the above paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendant’s legal statement (breathing, driving under drinking, shocking the victim E-owned car trucks and the victim G, and taking any measure against the damage of the above car cab trucks.