해고무효확인
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a local public enterprise established on June 23, 1999 and performed the management and operation of public facilities, such as public parking lots, sports facilities, roads, and the environment, by being entrusted with the management and operation of public facilities, such as public parking lots, sports facilities, and the environment, from November 17, 2010 to October 13, 201, when the Plaintiff was discharged from office on October 13, 201, through a lawsuit for unfair dismissal relief. Then, the Plaintiff was reinstated on May 26, 2014 to the Defendant Corporation, but was discharged from office on June 5, 2014. 2)
B. A criminal case related to sexual harassment between C and D, who is an employee of the Defendant Corporation, C, who is an employee of the Defendant Corporation, argued that D, before June 23, 2008, the former Chief of the Parking and Transportation Department D had sexual harassment on himself/herself on or around November 2008, he/she filed a petition with B Inspector, and filed a petition with the National Human Rights Commission of Korea on or around March 13, 2009. D had been present at the Incheon District Public Prosecutor’s Office B branch office of the Seoul District Public Prosecutor’s Office for the purport that “C was free from suspicion.” On August 13, 2009, he/she again filed a complaint with the same branch office to the effect that D was a witness of the said case, and that D was planning to have been indicted as a witness of the Seoul District Court’s 201Mo206, 2006, and 38,209.
3 The plaintiff requested from the second half of 2009 to give testimony to E in relation to sexual harassment cases between C and D, and the refusal of this request will not be made only if E refuses it.
a statement to the effect that it will be sent to the parking manager.