특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant left the scene of an accident without recognizing the fact of the accident, and there was no intention to flee.
The victim cannot be said to have suffered an injury to the extent that it needs medical treatment due to the accident in this case.
2. The judgment of the court below also asserted the same purport as the above grounds for appeal.
The court below stated that ① the victim was playing very little immediately after the accident in this case in an investigative agency and this court, and the victim was unable to get off because the driver was not opened, ② the defendant stated that the victim was forced to check only his vehicle left the truck immediately after the accident, ② the defendant changed course at an investigative agency to the left end of the victim’s vehicle, and the victim was shocked to the right part of the vehicle before the left end of the vehicle, followed the victim’s left end, and stopped again to the left end of the vehicle, and immediately after the accident, the driver of the damaged vehicle was installed and confirmed on the left side of the vehicle, and stated that the victim was unrelated to the victim’s vehicle. ③ The defendant’s vehicle was 25.5 tons dump truck and the victim was unable to conclude that the victim’s injury was minor merely due to shock in the victim’s vehicle and twice, ④ immediately after the accident in this case, the victim was hospitalized in the emergency hospital after the accident in this case, and the victim was unable to recover the victim’s disease in this case due to the disease in this case, and the disease in this case.