2. In full view of the factors that the Defendant committed the instant crime despite the past history of criminal punishment for fraud and crime of interference with business several times, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime, and that the Defendant did not recover damage therefrom, and that the amount of damage to the crime of fraud is not larger than 177,00 won, that the Defendant did not have any record of punishment for fraud or crime of interference with business after 2006, that the Defendant did not have any record of punishment for fraud or crime of interference with business, that is, the existence of alcohol, treatment with depression, and that economic circumstances are not good, and other factors that form the conditions for the sentencing specified in the records and arguments of the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct, and environment, it cannot be deemed unfair that the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.