2. Although the Defendant’s confession and reflects against the Defendant when he was in a trial, the crime of this case is deemed to be unfair in light of the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant, as well as the Defendant administered phiphones, sold not only a large amount of psychotropic drugs with phiphones, and that the nature of the crime is very poor in terms of harm and risk of recidivism, and that there was a history of punishment for the same kind of crime in the past, and that there was a history of punishment for the same kind of crime in the records of this case.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.