성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.
Punishment of the crime
On July 3, 2017, the Defendant discovered victims E (one, nine years of age), victim F (one, nine years of age), and victim E (one, nine years of age), located in D elementary school bus stops located in Seopopo City C on July 3, 2017, in order to return home, the Defendant found the victim E (one, one, nine years of age), and the victim E.
The father stated that he shall live several years of age, she was shingly shing the shoulder of the victim E in one arms, while continuously she was shing the shoulder of the victim F with the left shoulder behind the victim F, thereby making the victims of less than 13 years of age forcedly committing an indecent act.
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness G;
1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;
1. Each statement of E and F recorded in each statement video CD;
1. Each investigation report (specific suspect's specific / suspect's photograph attached);
1. A detailed statement of the processing of reported cases;
1. Determination of the Defendant’s assertion of related photographs
“The fact” is asked as “, however, that there was no indecent act against the victims, such as the description.
However, the victim E is waiting for a bus at the bus stop in the investigative agency, and the defendant is unsanitary while carrying a shoulderer in the aftermath of the bus.
In the end, approximately 30 seconds of the 1999.
In addition, the victim F has been at the bus stop, and the defendant was not able to prevent the victim F from working as a shoulderer even with the victim F.
The victim F made a statement to the effect that he was "," and the victim F was able to get a bus to a bus stop at the investigative agency, and the victim F was flick, but the Defendant flicked to flick the bus stop.
“The statements of the victims” are consistent and consistent with the main parts of the victims’ statements, and there is no unreasonable or contradictory part in light of the empirical rule even in itself, and the victims are hard.