2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The Defendants committed the instant crime by contingently, the Defendants committed the instant crime, the degree of the type of the instant crime, and the degree of the victim’s injury caused by the instant crime, and other circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered as having taken full account of the following factors, and it does not seem that the lower court’s punishment is too unfford and goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.