A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

1. Defendant A

A. On November 5, 2007, the Defendant forged securities without the authority (1)’s mother’s consent to (313,50,000, 300, 300,0000, 300,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,000,000 in the face value column of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value on November 5, 2007, “A”, “The issuer’s column of the due date of payment,” and “F’s seal attached to the F’s name,” and “B” (2) kept the F’s seal affixed to the column of the face value of the face value of the face value of other promissory notes.”

B. At the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) of the above Article 1, the Defendant held two copies of a forged promissory note to G with the Defendant’s creditors G, who are not aware of the fact, respectively, as if they were actually issued.

C. Around November 5, 2007, an entry of the original of the notarial deed was made in the E-office of the above law firm E, and the attorney-at-law in charge of the notarial deed No. 313,500,000 won in the original of the notarial deed No. 2007, the notarial deed was made to the effect that, by making a false report to the notary public and making a false statement on the notarial deed to the effect that, if the payment of the amount of KRW 313,50,000 in the notarial deed is delayed to the holder of the notarial deed No. 2007, the notarial deed was made to the effect that the notarial deed is not subject to compulsory execution, and (2) the notary public who is the original of the notarial deed shall enter the fact that the notarial deed was false in the notarial deed under the name of the law firm E.