When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 07:20 on March 14, 2014, the Defendant insultingd the victim by inserting a statement that “A male-friendly arrest B, who had a defect in living with the victim C, shall have access to the victim’s his or her his or her his or her his or her his or her father with his or her mobile phone, shall be allowed to be seen by an unspecified number of people who access the victim’s his or her his or her his or her his or her father with the victim’s his or her his or her his or her his or her his or her his or her father with the victim’s his or her his or her his or her his or her father with the victim’s his or her his or her his or her his or her father with the

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to screen a mobile phone closure;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;