beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2014.09.18 2013고단1478

사기등

Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

[Defendant B] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the J (hereinafter referred to as the “J”) that mainly focuses on the collection and transportation of excreta in the first floor of Pakistan, and Defendant B is a director of the said J in-house, and Defendant C is a person in a marital relationship, Defendant C is a managing director of the J in-house, Defendant D is a person working as the chief of the K apartment management office.

1. From around 2008 to around 2013, Defendant A entered into a contract for the collection of excreta with K apartment and Pakistan-si apartment, etc., Defendant C, who is the managing director of J, intended to claim for the collection of excreta with the management office of apartment by unfluoring the amount of excreta. Defendant C had the excreta collection vehicle enter the time and quantity of excreta collection in the work site for the purification of apartment, by making it possible for the excreta collection vehicle to enter the apartment without actually collecting excreta and only enter the apartment, and Defendant B did not normally collect excreta in accordance with the work site that Defendant C prepared with the falsity, but did not normally collect the excreta, Defendant C received the difference between KRW 10 to 205, as stated in the list of crimes, from October 208 to 25, 2008; Defendant C received the difference between KRW 364 to 265,206, 2063, 2065, 2067, 2067, 2567, 265, etc.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim apartment, claiming the cost of excreta collection, thereby deceiving the difference between the actual cost of excreta collection and the cost of excreta collection.

2. The Defendant A, at the end of July 2010, issued a certificate of breach of trust to the Defendant D, who is a staff member of the said apartment management office, through the K apartment located in the N at the end of the strike, through C, who is an employee of J.