2. In light of the fact that the defendant recognized all of his mistake and appears to have difficulty in the economic situation of the defendant, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of suspended execution due to the crime of this paper, the alteration of the private document of this case, the crime of uttering without permission for alteration of the lease contract which is a disposal document to succeed to the status of the business operator, the defendant has a large number of criminal records, and other sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and the balance of sentencing with other cases similar to this case, shall not be deemed unfair since the court below's punishment is too too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.