When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported at the cafeteria restaurant of the first floor of the D church located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, that the Defendant told E to the effect that “the Defendant is going to leave the wedding hours”; and (b) resisted to this effect.”

F and trial expense were the victim G (n, 65 years of age) and the victim G (n, 65 years of age) caused the loss of the victim's hand phone to be photographed with the Defendant's left hand, and the victim caused the damage to her part of the victim's hand, against the Defendant's breath and the wall pushed the victim's hand towards the wall, and caused the victim to go together with the upper part of the part of the victim's hand, and caused about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Recording of the witness G's statement in the third public trial records;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Side photographs of the assault;

1. Other closure photographs of the crime scene;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel regarding the issue of the Qing note (Ba Chapter 1) are as follows: “Although there is a fact that the Defendant’s two descendants contact the part of the Victim G with the part of the Victim G, the Defendant did not injure the part of the Victim by both descendants.

See the purport of “......”

However, in full view of the following circumstances revealed in the evidence revealed earlier, i.e., ① the victim’s legal and investigative agency’s statement on the course and time of damage is clear, specific, and consistent; ② the CCTV screen content on the situation at the time of the instant case also conforms to the victim’s statement; ③ the process and time when the victim received a hospital treatment and submitted to the investigative agency with a written diagnosis of injury; and ③ the process and time when the victim submitted it to the investigation agency with a hospital treatment and it is difficult to view it as an inevitable or exceptional, it is sufficiently recognized that the Defendant inflicted injury upon the victim in need of two weeks of treatment by

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument of the defendant and defense counsel.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.