In the event that the Defendants did not pay each fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant

A is the representative of the apartment unit, and the defendant B is the representative of the apartment unit, and there is no conflict due to the problem of managing and operating the apartment unit.

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2017. 12. 27. 14:00 경 경기 광명시 F에 있는 704동 공동 현관 앞에서, 피해자 B(47 세, 여) 과 아파트 관리 운영을 하면서 생긴 갈등에 대해 언쟁을 하다가 화가 나 피해자에게 달려와 피해자의 정강이를 1대 걷어차서 공소장에는 ‘ 피고인 A이 B의 왼쪽 어깨를 1대 내려치고, 바로 피해자의 정강이를 1대 걷어찼다.

However, the police statements of B, which correspond to the facts charged that they cut the left shoulder, are hard to believe in light of CCTV verification results, CCTV-cape photographs and images, etc., and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise (Provided, That there is no reason to find the Defendant not guilty of the grounds), which require treatment for about 14 days during the period of 14 days, the following legs and the other strings of the upper part.

2. On December 27, 2017, Defendant B, around 704 co-occins, at around 14:00, the Defendant consulted about conflicts arising from the management and operation of an apartment with the victim A (46 years old, south) and the apartment management, and then gling the victim’s face to the Defendant, the victim’s face to her hand, 1 to 1 to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to 14 days

Summary of Evidence

Defendant

A

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Protocol of the police statement regarding B, certificate of the injury inflicted on B, and image photographs of the damage inflicted on B;

1. As a result of CCTV verification, CCTV closure photographs and video Defendant B;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police officer;

1. The form of damage A, a photograph of injury A, and a written diagnosis;

1. As a result of CCTV verification, the CCTV-cap photographs, images, and recording records (based on each evidence, Defendant B committed each act listed in the facts charged to Defendant A.