The judgment below

Although examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on justifiable acts, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, even if the record is examined, there is no error of infringement of the defendant's right to assistance of counsel or right to defense, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.