beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.10.16 2014고단833

사기등

Text

The crimes of KRW 10,00,000,000, which are set forth in the judgment of the defendant 1 and 7, are the crimes of KRW 2 to 6,8, and 10.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution in the Gwangju District Court's Magpoon branch on August 22, 2009 and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 22, 2009.

"2014 Highest 833"

1. Around November 22, 2008, the Defendant against the victim D made a false statement to the victim that “I will use construction materials only in lieu of a loan of KRW 5 million because there is a shortage of money to purchase construction materials,” even if I did not intend or have an ability to repay the money from the victim D even if I borrowed money from the victim D.”

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 5 million won from the victim to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant on November 22, 2008, and received 3 million won from November 29, 2008, respectively, and obtained 2.5 million won in cash from the F Office Driner Park at Sinpo-si on December 2, 2008, and acquired 105 million won in cash from the F Office Driner Park at Sinpo-si on December 2, 2008.

2. Fraud against victim G;

A. On January 2010, the Defendant made a false statement with the victim G working in the Hapo-si, Hopo-si, Hapo-si, Hapo-si, Hapo-si, that “The Defendant would pay 1 million won of entertainment expenses after this title, even if he did not have any intent or ability to repay money even if he borrowed money from the victim G,” and that “The Defendant was unable to pay 1 million won of entertainment expenses because he did not have any money.”

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1 million from the victim to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant at that time, and acquired it by fraud.

B. At around January 31, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the I office where the Victim G works in J in the Jeonpo-si, Jeonpo-si, Jeonpo-si; (b) even though the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to subcontract the J Park-related construction works to the victim; (c) however, the Defendant, “the owner of the access road to J Park has completed almost the construction works at the time of the completion of the construction works at the J Park-si site; and (d) given the victim a subcontract for the said construction works at KRW 10 million.