도로교통법위반(음주운전)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment that the defendant reflects the crime is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.
On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.
There is a history of suspension of the two times due to drinking driving and punishment for a number of times, including a punishment.
Even though it does not seem to be the situation, it was also driven under the influence of drinking.
In light of the criminal records of these defendants and the behavior of drinking driving, the risk of recidivism is high.
Since there is a need to punish the defendant strictly.
In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., as well as the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.