However, it is against the Defendants for one year from the date of the final judgment of this case.

1. On October 12, 2016, Defendant B: (a) had a male who uses crypted app “F” in the house of Ilyang-dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E apartment A, Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong, 319; and (b) proposed that he/she left the Republic of Korea only for one hour and 1.50,000 won per time for sex relationship A with A; and (c) had A have a sexual intercourse with the above male at the trade incompet in the same location; and (d) received KRW 1.50,00 won per day from the end of September 2016 to October 30, 2016; and (e) arranged commercial sex acts, such as arranging sexual purchase through hosting of 2-3 times per day with the average volume of street f and H, and negotiating the conditions of commercial sex acts, and arranging sexual intercourse with A.

2. From April 2016 to October 30, 2016, Defendant A, along with the husband’s J, planned to conduct commercial sex acts by hosting it with K and selling it with the cryp “NH”, as described in paragraph (1) at the house of Dongducheon-si, 302 Dong-si, 402, and B. Defendant A, under the direction of J, had a sexual intercourse with K in 607 “Nel” located in Dongdu-si, Dongducheon-si, Ha and received 500,000 won in cash from K from April 2, 2016 to October 30, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Second-time suspect examination protocol against J;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police to K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to response (Evidence Analysis) as a result of 2016도요 18476;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

B. Defendant B: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts, and selection of imprisonment

1. A aggravated criminal defendant: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants in the suspension of execution: Defendant B had no previous conviction for the reason of sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A had the same criminal record, but did not have the criminal record exceeding the fine.