The plaintiff, E, and F are students who were enrolled in the first and second grade of the D Middle School. G, H, I, and J are students who were enrolled in the second grade of the same school.

D Middle School Violence Autonomy Committee (hereinafter referred to as the “Committee”) deliberated on September 18, 2017 on the case that the Plaintiff, E, F, G, H, H, and I (hereinafter referred to as “victims”)’s sexual harassment with the third degree disabled students with intellectual disability (hereinafter referred to as “victims”), and resolved on the disposition of 7 days for community service with F, the disposition of 5 days for each community service work against Plaintiff, E, G, and H, and the disposition of 5 days for I to provide school service (hereinafter referred to as “school service”).

On September 21, 2017, the defendant issued a disposition against aggressor students in accordance with the above resolution.

(hereinafter “previous Disposition”). On September 21, 2017, the Committee further deliberated on the foregoing issue on the ground that the previous disposition was not accompanied by concurrent and special education courses for aggressor students, and counseling treatment for victim students, and then resolved on F in writing, on September 21, 2017, on the following grounds: F in order to prohibit contact and intimidation; 7 days of community service; 10 hours of special education; 5 hours of students; 5 hours of contact and intimidation; 5 hours of special education; 5 hours of education; 10 hours of special education; 5 days of written apologys; 10 hours of education; 5 hours of special education; 5 hours of special education; 5 hours of education; 5 hours of special education; 5 hours of students; 5 hours of parents; and 10 hours of counseling treatment for victim students.

On September 22, 2017, the defendant disposed of the aggressor student and victim student according to the above resolution.

(2) The Defendant’s disposition against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”) is not a party with no dispute (based on recognition), and the Defendant has both concurrent and special education at the time of the previous disposition on September 21, 2017, as recognized earlier, as to the entries in the evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings.