2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victim D was a witness who reported the witness to the accident of this case to find the police, and the defendant was consistently made a statement about the left-hand turn after the signal to the left-hand turn, and attempted to change the vehicle into a dramab by checking the change to the left-hand turn signal, and then stop two prices for the vehicle. At that time, the defendant's vehicle appears to stop at about 10 meters from the stop line, but the vehicle was viewed to stop. However, the defendant continued to stop at a speed of 10 meters from the stop line. However, the defendant continued to stop the accident without a speed. ② The victim D was a witness who reported the police station to find the witness to find the accident of this case, and the defendant made a consistent statement about the part that the defendant was directly making a left-hand turn after the signal, and considering the fact that the defendant made the accident, driver's model, gender signal, etc., and accepted the credibility of this case.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.