beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.04.22 2015고합357

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2010, the Defendant established D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”) for the purpose of manufacturing motor vehicle parts, which are buildings C on the ground of Gyeongbuk-si, Gyeongbuk-si, and operated the said company as the representative director from around that time until October 23, 2013, which is the closing date of business.

1. Fraud to the Credit Guarantee Fund for Victims (hereinafter referred to as the "Credit Guarantee Fund");

A. On September 2010, the Defendant: (a) entered into a contract with an employee in charge of new construction (excluding surtax) of the cost of KRW 716,00,000 (excluding the portion of electrical construction related to D’s new construction work); (b) the portion of the electrical construction cost of KRW 110,00,000 (excluding surtax) in the cost of the construction; (c) the Defendant obtained a loan of KRW 570,00,000 from the Busan Bank to obtain a loan of KRW 826,00,000 from the cost of the new construction of the factory; and (d) submitted a standard contract with the employee in charge of the construction work of KRW 150,000,000,000 in the amount of the construction cost of KRW 826,000,000 necessary for the new construction of the factory; and (d) submitted a credit guarantee agreement to guarantee the construction cost of KRW 150,000,000.

However, in fact, since new reports determine the additional amount of guarantee and the amount of guarantee by comprehensively examining the necessary funds for the planning project at the time of guaranteeing facility funds, the ability to bear one’s own funds, and the method of raising other’s funds, the above receipts are false documents prepared to suggest the ability to bear one’s own funds as if the Defendant did not pay KRW 150,000 to the original construction (ju), and the standard contract for private construction works with the former term of the original term of the original term of the original term of the original term of the original term of the original term of the KRW 59,00,000, the actual cost of the construction is KRW 110,000,000, but the cost of the construction is KRW 110,000,000.

The defendant deceivings the employee in charge as above and belongs to it.