2. The Defendant’s crime of this case is a game room with 50 game machines and operated by means of exchanging game results in cash for about 13 days.

It can be considered as sentencing data favorable to the defendant that the defendant has led to the crime of this case, that there has been a number of people, that has been a sound work as a part of daily employment, and that the defendant has to live in the future.

However, the crime related to illegal game room needs to be strictly punished because of the high awareness of the society, such as promoting an excessive speculative spirit in our society and hindering sound labor practice.

In addition, even though the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months due to the crime that he/she was in the game room in around 2007 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years due to the fact that he/she was on the game room in around 2007, as an operator of the game room, confirmed the customers through CCTV, etc. while correcting the entrance of the game room, and operated the game room in a secret way to allow access, it is highly likely that the crime of this case may be

In addition, the sentence imposed by the court below is not heavy in full view of the records of this case and the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the change theory, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, balance of sentencing with the defendant.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.