However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 18, 2016, the defendant prepared a written complaint against D at the defendant's house located in Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun.

A written complaint states that "Around 18:30 on February 27, 2016, the defendant suffered assault against D in front of F in the G-Won E, which is located in the G-W on the road of the G-Won Kim Sung-gun, for about two weeks of treatment, due to the assault of G-W, which is beyond her wife, and suffered injuries, such as the mouths of the W-Won zone where treatment is required for about ten weeks of treatment."

However, the defendant and G did not have been assaulted against D at the time.

Nevertheless, on March 18, 2016, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the official in charge of civil petition affairs at the Seongbuk-gu civil petition office of the Seongbuk-gu police station located in 31-ro 1-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-do.

In this respect, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, H and I;

1. The police statement of the defendant;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation reports (Investigation by the Justice of the Court);

1. Each medical certificate and each defense counsel asserts that since D inflicts an injury on the defendant and his wife, the contents of the criminal complaint stated in the criminal complaint are true.

D, however, although the Defendant’s vehicle was set up in a narrow road in front of the F and thereby cut off the vehicle to the Defendant. However, the Defendant failed to cut off the vehicle due to the breakdown of the vehicle, and thus, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s vehicle by breaking the ebbbbbbbing the ebbb, and thereby breaking the Defendant. Nevertheless, the Defendant’s continued to kill the ebbb, and did not assault the Defendant, and the Defendant’s wife did not assault the Defendant, and the Defendant’s wife stated consistently and in detail at the investigative agency to the effect that there was no fact in the process of the Defendant’s ebbial, and at the present site at the time of the instant case.