A shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 700,000 won, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Defendant

A is the chairperson of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for Representatives of Residents, defendant B is the auditor of the above apartment tenant representative council, victim E is the above apartment tenant, and victim F is the victim of the above apartment.

1. Destruction of documents and interference with business;

A. Defendant A (1) around November 21, 2015, at around 21:42, Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant A”) opened a total of five notice of “the request for dismissal against A and B of the 14th occupants’ representative meeting,” and “the notice of dismissal of the 14th occupants’ representative meeting and the 107 occupants’ representative meeting,” which was attached within the elevator by the committee for the management of apartment buildings, in order to inform occupants of the fact that the request for dismissal against B was received on December 3, 2015.” In order to inform occupants of the fact that the Defendant was dismissed on December 3, 2015, Defendant A (1) opened the 107 occupants’ representative meeting, the chairman of the 107 occupants’ representative meeting, and the auditor’s representative meeting, and interfere with the smooth voting of the election management committee.”

(2) On November 12, 2015, around 22:24, the Defendant opened the said apartment complex 102 unit, as indicated in paragraph (1), and obstructed the smooth progress of voting affairs by the election commission, by putting the total five notice of “(5) notices of the chairperson of the 14th meeting of occupants, A, and B of the 14th meeting of occupants,” which was attached by the said apartment management commission inside the elevator, on his hand, and “public notice of dismissal of the chairperson and auditor of the 14th meeting of occupants,” as indicated in paragraph (1).

B. On November 12, 2015, around 21:50, Defendant B opened the above apartment house 101 unit elevator, and (1) as indicated in paragraph (1), Defendant B obstructed the smooth progress of voting affairs by the election commission for dismissal, by putting the total five notice of “(5) notices of the chairperson of the 14th meeting of occupants representatives of the D apartment building and the auditor B,” which was attached by the said apartment management commission inside the elevator, on his hand.

2. Defamation.