except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 3, 2013, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car on May 16:17, 2013, and proceeded along one lane of the third line road in the direction of the maritime police station at the front department store located in the side of the dispatching department. On the job’s negligence, the Defendant did not find the victim C (n, 50 years of age) and the victim D (n, 61 years of age) who laid the victim’s bridge from the right side of the above vehicle and did not find the victim C (n, 50 years of age) and the victim D (n, 61 years of age) and caused the victim C to suffer injuries, such as a shock pelel, which requires the victim to receive approximately 6 weeks medical treatment, and the victim D’s injury, which requires approximately 7 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of C and D;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the first and second crimes committed by the defendant, the fact that the motor vehicle comprehensive