If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[2] On December 7, 2015, the Defendant leased 1,4250,00 won to the victim C at the parking lot for the 2016 Highest 2008 Highest 2008, hereinafter “2008”) of the Busan Metropolitan City Maritime Transport Complex Parking Site: (a) around December 14, 2015, the Defendant offered the victim C as a security (hereinafter “the instant passenger car”). The Defendant also finds the vehicle with the money borrowed from lick and as a security.

“.....”

However, at the time of fact, the Defendant did not have any import, and the instant car was operated on a long-term lease from Ariju Capital, and the Defendant, on April 30, 2014, used only one month to E.

In addition, even if the return was requested by the above E on June 2014, it was refused without any justifiable reason, so there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money from the damaged party due to lack of real value of the collateral.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, was transferred from the victim to the National Bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant’s motherF used by the Defendant at around that time.

[2] On January 14, 2015, Busan District Court rendered a lawsuit against the Defendant for the delivery of the instant vehicle as Busan District Court Decision 2015Da3538, Oct. 20, 2015 (hereinafter “4029”) and the decision was rendered in favor of the Defendant around October 20, 2015, and became final and conclusive around November 27, 2015.

In order to escape compulsory execution from the date of the said judgment ( October 20, 2015) to December 7, 2015, Defendant 1, despite being aware of the fact that the said judgment was rendered, had the instant car moved to the place of a building underground parking lot, etc. in the center of Busan Shipping Daegu Center, and had the instant car move to the location of the building underground parking lot, etc., in order to escape compulsory execution. On December 7, 2015, Defendant 1 concealed the instant car from the method of delivering it to C and got the creditor spampling.

Summary of Evidence

[208] 1.1.