도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On January 26, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Incheon District Court on January 26, 201, and one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution for the same offense in the same court on October 17, 2011.
At around 17:40 on November 18, 2014, the Defendant, without a car driver’s license, driven a cams car from approximately 2 km to the front road of the walsium located in the GS25 Sindong in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, the main place of the walsium located in the walsium of Gyeyang-gu, Incheon to the front road of the convenience store of approximately 316, the Defendant driven a cams car from around 2 km.
around July 2012, the Defendant 2014 Man-Ma9474 operated the static point with the trade name of “H” in the Gu F, such as E Eart located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the victim I operated a livestock product wholesaler in J, and the victim K also operated a livestock product wholesaler in L.
1. On June 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that he would deliver livestock products to the victim I to the victim I and pay the price in cash to him at the place where he was not a policeman. However, the Defendant did not have any other specific income from the above static point at the time, and the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price even if he received livestock products from the victim due to the lack of proper monthly operation or circumstances.
The Defendant was provided by the victim with totaling KRW 19,957,565 from June 14, 2012 to September 5, 2012.
2. On July 2012, the Defendant supplied the victim K with livestock products at the refined landing point that he/she operates, and made a false statement that he/she would pay the price in cash. However, at the time of fact, the Defendant is different as stated in paragraph (1).