However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 11:10 on October 18, 2013, the Defendant, who interfered with business, d branch offices located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, d branch offices located in Yeongdeungpo-gu, and d branch offices, e.g., off the d branch offices, and e., “f.e., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., d.,” and obstructed the victim E’s security duties, who is the D security personnel, by continuously putting the d

2. From 11:38 to 11:50 on the first floor of the building in question, the Defendant, on the same day, abused the victims by referring to the victim G, the background leading up to the 112 report, the victim H, the police officer, the victim I, and the victim J, who was called the F District of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station, on the same ground as the above, to the extent that: (a) six to seven security personnel, such as the above E, and the number of DNA customers, the victims were f-7; and (b) the victims were f-hicked; (c) the victims were f-hicked; (d) the same fat, the bit of a bit of bitch, the bit of a bit of a bitch, the bit of a bit of a bitch, the bit of a bit of a bit of a bitch; and (e) the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to E, I, G, H, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site reports;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act among the crimes of insult;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (to the extent that the long-term punishment for each crime is added up);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing as follows) is that the defendant was punished for several times of violence, and the defendant has not been agreed with the victims until now. However, the defendant appears to be against his depth while making a confession of each of the crimes of this case, and the degree of each of the crimes of this case is not significant.