(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the instant accident, satisfying the right satisfy, and the satisfy, to the right sat.

The Defendant (Withdrawal) is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the said car, and transferred the said insurance contract to the succeeding intervenor around May 27, 2015 in accordance with the Insurance Business Act.

[Reasons for Recognition] No dispute exists, Gap evidence Nos. 1-4 and 12, and an intervenor succeeding to the purport of the whole pleadings is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case as a person transferred insurance contracts from the defendant (ex officio) who is the insurer.

The limitation of liability is also erroneous for the plaintiff to cross the road without carefully examining the movement of the vehicle while crossing the road, and thus, the succeeding intervenor's liability is limited to 80% in consideration of this.

Although the successor asserts that the plaintiff was crossing without permission in violation of the signal, there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

Except as otherwise provided under the scope of damages, it shall be as specified in the attached Table of Calculation of Damages.

(However, for calculation convenience, less than a month and less than a cost are discarded, and the current value at the time of the accident of this case shall be calculated by the simple discount method that deducts intermediary interest calculated by the rate of 5/12 per month at the time of the accident of this case). The work income and income: The market is limited to the next 36% of freight driver, freight driver, after-the-job disability and labor ability loss rate of 3 million won per month, and until the next 36% of the next 1st century of medical treatment costs by the rate of 3 million won per month.