When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant of "2018 High 392" is a holder of the bast lurged passenger vehicle.

On May 20, 2018, the Defendant operated the said vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from around 10:05, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at a distance of 100 meters from the front road of Kim Jong-si to the front road of the same city D.

"2018 High 393"

A. A. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) by the Defendant is a person driving a motor vehicle with detached motor vehicles from B. A.

On April 30, 2018, at around 16:50, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven the said vehicle at approximately 3 km from the front of Kim Jong-si to the front of Kim Jong-si, via “G store” located in F, without a driver’s license.

B. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of BA-to-purd passenger vehicle.

Defendant 1 operated the said motor vehicle without purchasing mandatory insurance at the time, place, and place referred to in the above “A.”

Summary of Evidence

"2018 High 392"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Reporting on the detection of the designated person's location;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Reference to teas and mandatory insurance, 2018 fixed 393;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Making teas;

1. Application of two mandatory insurance-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 152 subparag. 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed driving point) concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines, respectively, under Article 46(2)2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8 (main sentence) of the same Act, and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.