However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 피해자 B(52세)의 친동생으로 2019. 9. 27. 저녁 무렵 피해자의 처로부터 전화상으로 “이제 시동생 연을 끊겠다”라는 말을 듣고 화가 나 위험한 물건인 라쳇렌치(총길이 30cm)와 식칼(총길이 30cm, 칼날길이 19cm)을 소지한 상태로 피해자의 집으로 찾아갔다.

피고인은 2019. 9. 27. 22:50경 부산 부산진구 C에 있는 피해자의 주거지 앞에 이르러, 라쳇렌치로 대문을 수차례 두드리며 “문을 열라”고 소리를 지르고, 문을 열고 나온 피해자에게 라쳇렌치를 빼앗기자 식칼을 꺼내 손에 들고 피해자를 향해 겨누면서 “찌른다”라고 위협하였다.

이로써 피고인은 위험한 물건인 라쳇렌치와 식칼을 휴대하여 피해자를 협박하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] for violent crimes [Type 4] for repeated crimes and special intimidation [Special Aggravationd Persons] for mitigation: The area of reduction of punishment [the area of recommendation and recommendation range], the area of reduction of punishment [the area of recommendation and recommendation range], and two months through one year;

2. Taking into account the fact that the person has agreed with the victim to whom the sentence has been sentenced, the fact that there is no history of criminal punishment exceeding the fine and that there is against his mistake