beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.01.05 2015고단1248

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, there is a charge of forging private documents and exercising a falsified investigation document.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 12, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Incheon District Court's Branch Branch on July 12, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 14, 2013 in the Ansan Prison.

On July 13, 2015, the Defendant posted D’s cell phone page on the north of the cell phone page “a loan has to be made or a large amount of money has to be made, the call liquor tax for the need of rapid transmission, and the call liquor tax for the need of the need, such as the cost of living, etc.

“A person who requested a loan by reporting and lending the advertisement to E, after making a member enter the mobile phone with a credit inquiry of “F” and having him/her enter the mobile phone, and having him/her receive the resident registration number and the password of the above loan, and received a personal credit inquiry by obtaining the resident registration number and the password of the E’s official certificate and the password of the security card, and received the E’s new bank and the Saemaul credit cooperative account by facsimile by using the E’s official certificate and the password.

1. On July 14, 2015, around 08:20, the Defendant applied for a loan under the name of E by accessing the victim-type savings bank, victim SBI Savings Bank, and the Internet site for the victim-type loan of the victim Tae River by using a computer in the room, and submitted a written statement of financial transaction of the Saemaul Treasury in the name of E.

However, in fact, the details of transactions in the Saemaul Treasury in the name of E were false.

As such, the Defendant deceivings each employee of the Victim Sejong Savings Bank, Victim SBI Savings Bank, and Victim Tae River loan, and then deceivings each employee from the Victim Sejong Savings Bank, 7 million won from the Victim Sejong Savings Bank, 5 million won from the Victim Sejong Savings Bank, and 3 million won from the Victim Tae River loan, respectively, and acquired 15 million won in total from each transfer as a loan.

2. On June 23, 2015, the Defendant applied for access to the Internet site of the victim Tae River loan and loan in the name of access to the Internet site of the victim, and the Defendant’s account of the Saemaul Treasury J account in the I’s name.