However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 4, 2017, at around 03:40 around 03:40, the Defendant: (a) was frightened by a police officer, who was called up after receiving 112 a report, such as taking a bath to a restaurant employee; and (b) was removed from a slope F, a police officer of the net police station Emba, who was called up after receiving 112 a report; (c) whether the Defendant “I fright fright fright, fright fright,” and:

The tobacco, why he said, called "I will not get fat, fat, I will not get fat," was put toward the chest of the above F. The tobacco that the f. was f. at one time by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F, G, and H;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the criminal records of the defendant's crime ( majority of the same type of punishment and fine) with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and the content of the crime in this case, a sentence to prevent recidivism shall be selected, but a sentence to prevent recidivism shall be determined in consideration of the defendant's disease, age, environment, etc.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. On August 4, 2017, at around 03:30, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim I, an employee of the said restaurant, to pay the drinking value to the Defendant; (b) the Defendant, who is the victim of the instant restaurant, was able to put the victim in the instant restaurant in the form of the victim’s hearing by J and other customers, who is an employee of the said restaurant.

The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the bit of bitch bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a family.

2. The part concerning the above facts charged is an offense falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

In this regard, the victim I want to punish the defendant.