When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 22, 2014, the Defendant, the creditor, was present at the court on December 22, 2014 on the basis of the decision of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-dong case(2014Kao759), which is the date when the property relationship is named, pursuant to the decision of the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-do case(2014Kao759).

The Defendant was present at the above court and submitted a false list of property by attending the above court and being awarded a successful bid for real estate owned by the said Defendant, despite that “B 301 and 501 of the Gu and the ownership was registered under the name of the Defendant.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning filing of a complaint, a written decision on specification of property, list of property, report on property, full certificate of registered matters, and content of the case;

1. Article 68 (9) of the Civil Execution Act and Article 68 (9) of the same Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;