beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.11.28 2014고단170

사기등

Text

Defendant

A 4 years of imprisonment for the defendant B, 2 years of imprisonment for the defendant B, and the attached list 1. A of the judgment of the defendant C, 1.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

Criminal history and occupation Defendant A is a person who operated a loan brokerage office (hereinafter referred to as “instant loan brokerage office”) in accordance with F. 202 and 901 of the building F.S., Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu.

Defendant

B On September 7, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution as a violation of the Personal Information Protection Act by the Seoul Southern District Court on September 7, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 13, 2013 and served as the head of the management office of the said office.

Defendant

C On November 29, 2012, a person who was sentenced to one year of embezzlement and two years of suspended execution at the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court) on December 7, 2012 and is still under suspended execution, and was in charge of the management of deposits, withdrawals, and salaries of employees at the above office.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. The fraudulent defendant A, who pretended to be a financial company such as "SC Finance" or "Mano Financial", confirmed the intention of the loan by phoneing to many unspecified customers disclosed from the domestic company or financial company, followed by allowing the customer to peruse the credit rating of the Korea Credit Rating Company with the resident registration number of the customer who wants the loan, and prepare for the documents necessary for the loan such as withholding receipt, certificate of employment, etc., and let the customer be given a normal loan by guiding the bank at the place of residence or the place of work of the customer and allowing the customer to take out the loan in a normal condition, but the defendant B, the defendant C, and the loan counselor's employees, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "G, HI, I, J, J, K, K, L, M, N, P, Q, Q, and 12 persons (the defendant B), including the defendant B, the loan manager, the financial advisory staff, and the loan broker of this case, and the defendant C, the loan broker of this case.