손해배상(기)
1. The part concerning the claim for consolation money in the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.
3...
1. Basic facts
A. (1) Around 09:00 on May 3, 2009, the Plaintiff was standing a crosswalk with no signal lights, etc. from B apartment B apartment 104 front roads at the time of door-gu around May 3, 2009. A traffic accident involving the part on the part of the front part of the motor vehicle owned by C, which is owned by C, facing the part on the Plaintiff’s left side bridge (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).
2) At the time of the instant traffic accident, the Defendant was an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the said D-owned automobiles at the time of the instant traffic accident.
B. On May 4, 2009, the following day of the instant traffic accident, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the F Hospital on May 4, 2009 as follows: “The Plaintiff underwent an operation on the left knee portion at the instant hospital on the left knee portion.”
C. 1) On April 12, 2010, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking confirmation that there was no Defendant’s debt related to the instant traffic accident under the Daegu District Court resident support 2010Kadan1561, and the Plaintiff also filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on March 18, 201 to compensate the Defendant for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant traffic accident (hereinafter “previous lawsuit”).
(2) On June 16, 201, according to the court’s order, the Plaintiff expressed the opinion that “(i) the Daegu Tol University doctor (a non-permanent department) who appraised the Plaintiff on June 16, 201, complained of the Plaintiff’s interference with the Do-do-do-scopic movement at the low-forest phenomenon and the Do-do-scopic movement at the right as of the date of appraisal. ② The current treatment has been completed, and there is no special aggravation in the future, need for treatment. ③ The degree of the Plaintiff’s disability is applied only for two years, and is about 14%.
3. In addition, in the above lawsuit, the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff KRW 7,618,219 and delay damages. The above amount is two years from June 16, 201 to June 15, 2013, which is the appraisal date.