However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 19, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for gambling at the Changwon District Court for the crime of habitual gambling, and was sentenced to six times more penalties due to habitual gambling crimes.

From September 11, 2015 to 20:20 on September 11, 2015, the Defendant habitually b, C, D, E, F, G, H, and name influence, and she saw the first three points in accordance with the rules set out in Chapter 50 to 20:20 of the same day from September 11, 2015, the Defendant: (a) carried out gambling in a manner that a person who habitually pays three points in accordance with the rules set out in Chapter 50 to 20:30; (b) divided the first three points into two flus; and (c) took money into two flus; and (d) additionally collected money in a high number of 5,00 won for each flusent; and (d) she sawd “Adog glus” as “Ado glus.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of a police officer in relation to B, F, G, J, C, E, or H;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Photographs, on-site map, and photograph;

1. Previous conviction: Inquiry of criminal history;

1. Habitualness of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime and the method of crime;

1. Article 246 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration, health conditions, etc.);

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;