The Defendants did not submit a document, such as the reply, in which they received a duplicate of the complaint of this case and arranged the Defendants’ positions (the documents submitted in the name of the Defendants in the records of this case are submitted by “E”, which is one of the Defendants’ agents. However, since there was no fact that the Defendants submitted an application for permission of litigation agent designating “E” as the legal representative and received permission of litigation agent designating “E” as the legal representative, they cannot be deemed to be the Defendants’ legal representative. Accordingly, the Defendants did not appear on the date of pleading. Accordingly, they did not appear on the date of pleading.

2. If so, pursuant to the main text of Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act and the main text of Article 150(1) of the same Act, the Defendants led to confession as to the facts as stated in the annexed claim, and therefore, the Plaintiff’s claim for payment of this case is justified.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is accepted, and it is so decided as per Disposition.