The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. Defendant A is a C agency employee.

On September 4, 2015, the Defendant received a request from the Party B who purchased a frighting passenger car through the Defendant from the Party B to operate the frighting passenger car at the time of the frighting game. On the frighting passenger car which was kept in custody in the above E, the period of validity of the frighting passenger car which had already been kept in custody in the above E has already expired (from June 10, 2015).

6. By the 19.19., after attaching the permission number F to the said car, the temporary operation permission number plate was illegally used by transferring it to the husband of B.

2. Around September 10, 2015, Defendant B, even though being aware of the fact that the aforementioned temporary operating permission number plate had already expired on the road prior to the search site in Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Seo-dong, the Defendant used the temporary operating permission number plate by denying the use of the temporary operating permission number plate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to violating vehicles, as a result of inquiry into the accusation, G’s written statement, and temporary operational information by the head of the mine district;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the Automobile Management Act and Article 71 (1) of the same Act; Selection of a fine;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: It shall be decided as per the Disposition for not less than Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;